lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19b3ce4b4bdc5f97d38e7880ec40c1ab@dev.tdt.de>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:22:10 +0100
From:   Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     kubakici@...pl, khc@...waw.pl, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] wan/hdlc_x25: make lapb params configurable

On 2020-01-21 12:01, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:41:52 +0100 (CET)
> 
>> From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 07:00:33 +0100
>> 
>>> This enables you to configure mode (DTE/DCE), Modulo, Window, T1, T2, 
>>> N2 via
>>> sethdlc (which needs to be patched as well).
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
>> 
>> Applied to net-next.
> 
> I seriously wonder how much you tested this code, because the compiler 
> warned
> me about:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
> index 63c9aeed9a34..c84536b03aa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_x25.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct net_device *dev,
> struct ifreq *ifr)
>  			return -EBUSY;
> 
>  		/* backward compatibility */
> -		if (ifr->ifr_settings.size = 0) {
> +		if (ifr->ifr_settings.size == 0) {
>  			new_settings.dce = 0;
>  			new_settings.modulo = 8;
>  			new_settings.window = 7;
> 
> I'll commit that fix, but this is truly careless especially since the 
> compiler
> warns about it.

I really want to apologize for that. I am currently working with
several branches of different kernel versions (mainly 4.19) and I
have overlooked this error when porting the latest changes.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ