lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:22:22 +0530
From:   Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@...il.com>,
        Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@...k.edu.in>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] pie: rearrange structure members and
 their initializations

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:39 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:14:50 +0530
>
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:05 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: gautamramk@...il.com
> >> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:42:44 +0530
> >>
> >> > From: "Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@...k.edu.in>
> >> >
> >> > Rearrange the members of the structures such that they appear in
> >> > order of their types. Also, change the order of their
> >> > initializations to match the order in which they appear in the
> >> > structures. This improves the code's readability and consistency.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Mohit P. Tahiliani <tahiliani@...k.edu.in>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@...il.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamramk@...il.com>
> >>
> >> What matters for structure member ordering is dense packing and
> >> grouping commonly-used-together elements for performance.
> >>
> > We shall reorder the variables as per their appearance in the
> > structure and re-submit. Could you elaborate a bit on dense packing?
>
> It means eliminating unnecessary padding in the structure.  F.e. if
> you have:
>
>         u32     x;
>         u64     y;
>
> Then 32-bits of wasted space will be inserted after 'x' so that
> 'y' is properly 64-bit aligned.
>
> If in doubt use the 'pahole' tool to see how the structure is
> laid out.  It will show you where unnecessary padding exists as
> well.

Thanks David. Do you recommend we discard/keep this patch? pahole
reports no problems with or without this patch. However, we'll be correcting
issues with other structs in sch_pie.c and sch_fq_pie.c.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ