[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200122000322.ogarpgwv3xut75m3@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:03:23 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] bpf: Add bpf_perf_event_output_kfunc
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 01:05:08PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Adding support to use perf_event_output in
> BPF_TRACE_FENTRY/BPF_TRACE_FEXIT programs.
>
> Using nesting regs array from raw tracepoint helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 19e793aa441a..6a18e2ae6e30 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -1172,6 +1172,43 @@ raw_tp_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> }
> }
>
> +BPF_CALL_5(bpf_perf_event_output_kfunc, void *, ctx, struct bpf_map *, map,
> + u64, flags, void *, data, u64, size)
> +{
> + struct pt_regs *regs = get_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(regs))
> + return PTR_ERR(regs);
> +
> + perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
> + ret = ____bpf_perf_event_output(regs, map, flags, data, size);
> + put_bpf_raw_tp_regs();
> + return ret;
> +}
I'm not sure why copy paste bpf_perf_event_output_raw_tp() into new function.
> @@ -1181,6 +1218,10 @@ tracing_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> return &bpf_skb_output_proto;
> #endif
> default:
> + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FENTRY ||
> + prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_FEXIT)
> + return kfunc_prog_func_proto(func_id, prog);
> +
> return raw_tp_prog_func_proto(func_id, prog);
Are you saying bpf_perf_event_output_raw_tp() for some reason
didn't work for fentry/fexit?
But above is exact copy-paste and it somehow worked?
Ditto for patches 3,4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists