lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:13:53 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>
Cc:     ariel.elior@...vell.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/14] qed: bump driver version

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Michal Kalderon wrote:
> The FW brings along a large set of fixes and features which will be added
> at a later phase. This is an adaquete point to bump the driver version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

We discussed this a lot, those driver version bumps are stupid and
have nothing close to the reality. Distro kernels are based on some
kernel version with extra patches on top, in RedHat world this "extra"
is a lot. For them your driver version say nothing. For users who
run vanilla kernel, those versions are not relevant too, because
running such kernels requires knowledge and understanding.

You definitely should stop this enterprise cargo cult of "releasing
software" by updating versions in non-controlled by you distribution
chain.

Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists