[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200122024138.3385590-1-ast@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:41:38 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix error path under memory pressure
Restore the 'if (env->cur_state)' check that was incorrectly removed during
code move. Under memory pressure env->cur_state can be freed and zeroed inside
do_check(). Hence the check is necessary.
Fixes: 51c39bb1d5d1 ("bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ca17dccc17ba..6defbec9eb62 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9594,8 +9594,13 @@ static int do_check_common(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog)
ret = do_check(env);
out:
- free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true);
- env->cur_state = NULL;
+ /* check for NULL is necessary, since cur_state can be freed inside
+ * do_check() under memory pressure.
+ */
+ if (env->cur_state) {
+ free_verifier_state(env->cur_state, true);
+ env->cur_state = NULL;
+ }
while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL));
free_states(env);
if (ret)
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists