[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0bajc3l.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:50:54 -0800
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Cc: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>,
"davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"hauke.mehrtens\@intel.com" <hauke.mehrtens@...el.com>,
"gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"allison\@lohutok.net" <allison@...utok.net>,
"tglx\@linutronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hkallweit1\@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"saeedm\@mellanox.com" <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"andrew\@lunn.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"f.fainelli\@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"alexandru.ardelean\@analog.com" <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
"jiri\@mellanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"ayal\@mellanox.com" <ayal@...lanox.com>,
"pablo\@netfilter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"simon.horman\@netronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [v1,net-next, 1/2] ethtool: add setting frame preemption of traffic classes
Hi,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> writes:
> Hi Murali,
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 20:04, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com> wrote:
>>
>> I have question about the below parameters in The Gate Parameter Table
>> that are not currently supported by tc command. Looks like they need to
>> be shown to user for management.
>>
>> - ConfigChange - Looks like this needs to be controlled by
>> user. After sending admin command, user send this trigger to start
>> copying admin schedule to operation schedule. Is this getting
>> added to tc command?
>
> "The ConfigChange parameter signals the start of a
> configuration change for the gate
> when it is set to TRUE. This should only be done
> when the various administrative parameters
> are all set to appropriate values."
>
> As far as my understanding goes, all tc-taprio commands currently
> behave as though this boolean is implicitly set to TRUE after the
> structures have been set up. I'm not sure there is any value in doing
> otherwise.
>
>> - ConfigChangeTime - The time at which the administrative variables
>> that determine the cycle are to be copied across to the
>> corresponding operational variables, expressed as a PTP timescale
>
> This is the base-time of the admin schedule, no?
>
> "The PTPtime at which the next config change is scheduled to occur.
> The value is a representation of a PTPtime value,
> consisting of a 48-bit integer
> number of seconds and a 32-bit integer number of nanoseconds."
>
>> - TickGranularity - the management parameters specified in Gate
>> Parameter Table allow a management station to discover the
>> characteristics of an implementation’s cycle timer clock
>> (TickGranularity) and to set the parameters for the gating cycle
>> accordingly.
>
> Not sure who is going to use this and for what purpose, but ok.
>
>> - ConfigPending - A Boolean variable, set TRUE to indicate that
>> there is a new cycle configuration awaiting installation.
>
> I had tried to export something like this (driver calls back into
> sch_taprio.c when hw has applied the config, this would result in
> ConfigPending = FALSE), but ultimately didn't finish the idea, and it
> caused some problems too, due to incorrect RCU usage.
>
If this should be exported, this should be done from taprio, perhaps
adding a new field to what is exported via the dump() callback, which
should be quite easy.
>> - ConfigChangeError - Error in configuration (AdminBaseTime <
>> CurrentTime)
>
> This can be exported similarly.
In my view, having this as a "runtime" error is not useful, as we can
verify this at configuration time.
>
>> - SupportedListMax - Maximum supported Admin/Open shed list.
>>
>> Is there a plan to export these from driver through tc show or such
>> command? The reason being, there would be applications developed to
>> manage configuration/schedule of TSN nodes that would requires these
>> information from the node. So would need a support either in tc or
>> some other means to retrieve them from hardware or driver. That is my
>> understanding...
>>
Hm, now I understamd what you meant here...
>
> Not sure what answer you expect to receive for "is there any plan".
> You can go ahead and propose something, as long as it is reasonably
> useful to have.
... if this is indeed useful, perhaps one way to do is to add a subcommand
to TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO, so we can retrieve the stats/information we want
from the driver. Similar to what cls_flower does.
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Murali
>>
>> --
>> Murali Karicheri
>> Texas Instruments
>
> Thanks,
> -Vladimir
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists