netdev - Re: [Patch net] net_sched: fix datalen for ematch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200123.213529.793076422651134151.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:35:29 +0100 (CET)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+5af9a90dad568aa9f611@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+2f07903a5b05e7f36410@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net] net_sched: fix datalen for ematch

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:42:02 -0800

> syzbot reported an out-of-bound access in em_nbyte. As initially
> analyzed by Eric, this is because em_nbyte sets its own em->datalen
> in em_nbyte_change() other than the one specified by user, but this
> value gets overwritten later by its caller tcf_em_validate().
> We should leave em->datalen untouched to respect their choices.
> 
> I audit all the in-tree ematch users, all of those implement
> ->change() set em->datalen, so we can just avoid setting it twice
> in this case.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5af9a90dad568aa9f611@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+2f07903a5b05e7f36410@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.