[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACAyw9_OGBbsXepTcp=1frEHB7Q2cD9BVXTbgt7Ci_eFyV2Egg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:00:03 +0000
From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport tests
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Martin Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
>
> btw, it needs a Fixes tag.
>
> Patch 4 and Patch 1 also need a Fixes tag.
This makes me wonder, should these go via bpf or bpf-next? Do I have
to split the series then?
--
Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK
www.cloudflare.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists