lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:55:01 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net/core: Replace driver version to be kernel
 version



On 1/25/2020 8:14 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> 
> In order to stop useless driver version bumps and unify output
> presented by ethtool -i, let's overwrite the version string.
> 
> Before this change:
> [leonro@...er ~]$ ethtool -i eth0
> driver: virtio_net
> version: 1.0.0
> After this change:
> [leonro@...ver ~]$ ethtool -i eth0
> driver: virtio_net
> version: 5.5.0-rc6+
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>> ---
>  Changelog:
>  v1: Resend per-Dave's request
>      https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200125.101311.1924780619716720495.davem@davemloft.net
>      No changes at all and applied cleanly on top of "3333e50b64fe Merge branch 'mlxsw-Offload-TBF'"
>  v0: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200123130541.30473-1-leon@kernel.org

There does not appear to be any explanation why we think this is a good
idea for *all* drivers, and not just the ones that are purely virtual?

Are you not concerned that this is ABI and that specific userland may be
relying on a specific info format and we could now be breaking their
version checks? I do not disagree that the version is not particularly
useful for in-tree kernel, but this is ABI, and breaking user-space is
usually a source of support questions.

> ---
>  net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> index 182bffbffa78..a403decacb6d 100644
> --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/phy.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/vermagic.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/sfp.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -666,6 +667,8 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev,
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}
> 
> +	strlcpy(info.version, UTS_RELEASE, sizeof(info.version));
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * this method of obtaining string set info is deprecated;
>  	 * Use ETHTOOL_GSSET_INFO instead.
> --
> 2.24.1
> 

-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ