netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net/core: Replace driver version to be kernel version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31c6c46a-63b2-6397-5c75-5671ee8d41c3@pensando.io>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jan 2020 13:17:52 -0800
From:   Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Michal Kalderon <michal.kalderon@...vell.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/core: Replace driver version to be kernel
 version

On 1/26/20 1:08 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> The long-standing policy in kernel that we don't really care about
> out-of-tree code.

That doesn't mean we need to be aggressively against out-of-tree code.  
One of the positive points about Linux and loadable modules has always 
been the flexibility that allows and encourages innovation, and helps 
enable more work and testing before a driver can become a fully-fledged 
part of the kernel.  This move actively discourages part of that 
flexibility and I think it is breaking part of the usefulness of modules.

sln