lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200126132004.GA70786@pmessmer-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:20:04 +0200
From:   Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+eba992608adf3d796bcc@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix race condition in hci_release_sock()

Hi Dan,

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Syzbot managed to trigger a use after free "KASAN: use-after-free Write
> in hci_sock_bind".  I have reviewed the code manually and one possibly
> cause I have found is that we are not holding lock_sock(sk) when we do
> the hci_dev_put(hdev) in hci_sock_release().  My theory is that the bind
> and the release are racing against each other which results in this use
> after free.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+eba992608adf3d796bcc@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> Not tested!  Please review very very carefully!
> 
> I feel like maybe someone should audit the (struct proto_ops)->release()
> functions because there may be similar bugs to this in other drivers.
> 
>  net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

The patch looks correct to me since it's following the same locking
conventions as all the other socket callbacks in hci_sock.c. I also
verified that it doesn't cause regressions in the various socket testers
we have in user space BlueZ (e.g. tools/l2cap-tester). The patch is now
applied to the bluetooth-next tree. Thanks!

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ