[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200126132004.GA70786@pmessmer-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:20:04 +0200
From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
syzbot <syzbot+eba992608adf3d796bcc@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix race condition in hci_release_sock()
Hi Dan,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Syzbot managed to trigger a use after free "KASAN: use-after-free Write
> in hci_sock_bind". I have reviewed the code manually and one possibly
> cause I have found is that we are not holding lock_sock(sk) when we do
> the hci_dev_put(hdev) in hci_sock_release(). My theory is that the bind
> and the release are racing against each other which results in this use
> after free.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+eba992608adf3d796bcc@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> Not tested! Please review very very carefully!
>
> I feel like maybe someone should audit the (struct proto_ops)->release()
> functions because there may be similar bugs to this in other drivers.
>
> net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
The patch looks correct to me since it's following the same locking
conventions as all the other socket callbacks in hci_sock.c. I also
verified that it doesn't cause regressions in the various socket testers
we have in user space BlueZ (e.g. tools/l2cap-tester). The patch is now
applied to the bluetooth-next tree. Thanks!
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists