[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200127062518.4274b802@cakuba>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 06:25:18 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/16] devlink: add macros for "fw.roce" and
"board.nvm_cfg"
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:12:52 +0530, Vasundhara Volam wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:48 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 04:03:08 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
> > > --- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-info.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-info.rst
> > > @@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ board.manufacture
> > >
> > > An identifier of the company or the facility which produced the part.
> > >
> > > +board.nvm_cfg
> > > +-------------
> > > +
> > > +Non-volatile memory version of the board.
> >
> > Could you describe a little more detail? Sounds a little similar to
> > fw.psid which Mellanox has added, perhaps it serves the same purpose
> > and we could reuse that one?
> It is almost similar. We can reuse and update documentation in
> bnxt.rst mentioning
> that parameter set is present in NVM .
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists