netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec v3 0/2] ipsec interfaces: fix sending with bpf_redirect() / AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200127095810.GC27973@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:58:10 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec v3 0/2] ipsec interfaces: fix sending with
 bpf_redirect() / AF_PACKET sockets

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:28:10AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 15/01/2020 à 10:56, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:32:45AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >> Before those patches, packets sent to a vti[6]/xfrm interface via
> >> bpf_redirect() or via an AF_PACKET socket were dropped, mostly because
> >> no dst was attached.
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >>   - fix flowi info for the route lookup
> >>
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >>   - remove useless check against skb_dst() in xfrmi_xmit2()
> >>   - keep incrementing tx_carrier_errors in case of route lookup failure
> >>
> >>  net/ipv4/ip_vti.c         | 13 +++++++++++--
> >>  net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c        | 13 +++++++++++--
> >>  net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied to the ipsec tree, thanks a lot!
> > 
> Thanks. Those patches are now in Linus tree:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=95224166a903
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f042365dbffe
> 
> Could you queue them for stable trees?

I'll do an ipsec stable submission the next days.