netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] ethtool netlink interface, part 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:27:46 +0100 (CET)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mkubecek@...e.cz
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
        andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, linville@...driver.com,
        johannes@...solutions.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] ethtool netlink interface, part 2

From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:57:44 +0100

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:40:49AM +0100, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
>> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 23:10:58 +0100 (CET)
>> 
>> > This shorter series adds support for getting and setting of wake-on-lan
>> > settings and message mask (originally message level). Together with the
>> > code already in net-next, this will allow full implementation of
>> > "ethtool <dev>" and "ethtool -s <dev> ...".
>> > 
>> > Older versions of the ethtool netlink series allowed getting WoL settings
>> > by unprivileged users and only filtered out the password but this was
>> > a source of controversy so for now, ETHTOOL_MSG_WOL_GET request always
>> > requires CAP_NET_ADMIN as ETHTOOL_GWOL ioctl request does.
>> 
>> It looks like this will need to be respun at least once, and net-next
>> is closing today so....
> 
> The problem with ethnl_parse_header() name not making it obvious that it
> takes a reference is not introduced in this series, the function is
> already in net-next so that it does not matter if this series is merged
> or not. Other than that, there is only the missing "the" in
> documentation.

Ok, I'll reconsider, thanks.