[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eevicerh.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:13:22 -0800
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, vladimir.oltean@....com, po.liu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] taprio: Allow users not to specify "flags" when changing schedules
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 15:52:26 -0800
>
>> When any offload mode is enabled, users had to specify the
>> "flags" parameter when adding a new "admin" schedule.
>>
>> This fix allows that parameter to be omitted when adding a new
>> schedule.
>>
>> This will make that we have one source of truth for 'flags'.
>>
>> Fixes: 4cfd5779bd6e ("taprio: Add support for txtime-assist mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
>> Acked-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> This will visibly change behavior for a feature in a released
> kernel (v5.3 and later) and it means that newer tools will do
> things that don't work in older kernels.
>
> I think your opportunity to adjust these semantics, has therefore,
> long passed.
Understood. Another lesson learned.
I'll need to send another version then. This semantic change have
creeped up to the "rcu stall" fix.
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists