[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200129.131511.287823999185152451.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:15:11 +0100 (CET)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ivecera@...hat.com
Cc: poros@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] phy: avoid unnecessary link-up delay in polling
mode
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:06:22 +0100
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:13:08 +0100
> Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index 6a5056e0ae7757..d5f4804c34d597 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -1930,9 +1930,10 @@ int genphy_update_link(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>
>> /* The link state is latched low so that momentary link
>> * drops can be detected. Do not double-read the status
>> - * in polling mode to detect such short link drops.
>> + * in polling mode to detect such short link drops except
>> + * the link was already down.
>> */
>> - if (!phy_polling_mode(phydev)) {
>> + if (!phy_polling_mode(pihydev) || !phydev->link) {
> ^
> Please remove the extra 'i' ----
How could this have ever been even build tested, let alone functionally
tested? :-/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists