[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200131100712.5ba1ce65@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:07:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, valex@...lanox.com,
linyunsheng@...wei.com, lihong.yang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] netdevsim: support taking immediate snapshot via
devlink
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:58:59 -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Implement the .snapshot region operation for the dummy data region. This
> enables a region snapshot to be taken upon request via the new
> DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_SNAPSHOT command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 38 +++++++++++++++----
> .../drivers/net/netdevsim/devlink.sh | 5 +++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> index d521b7bfe007..924cd328037f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> @@ -38,24 +38,47 @@ static struct dentry *nsim_dev_ddir;
>
> #define NSIM_DEV_DUMMY_REGION_SIZE (1024 * 32)
>
> +static int nsim_dev_take_snapshot(struct devlink *devlink,
nit: break the line after static int, you've done it in other patches
so I trust you agree it's a superior formatting style :)
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> + u8 **data,
> + devlink_snapshot_data_dest_t **destructor)
> +{
> + void *dummy_data;
> +
> + dummy_data = kmalloc(NSIM_DEV_DUMMY_REGION_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dummy_data) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Out of memory");
Unnecessary, there will be an OOM splat, and ENOMEM is basically
exactly the same as the message.
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + get_random_bytes(dummy_data, NSIM_DEV_DUMMY_REGION_SIZE);
> +
> + *data = dummy_data;
> + *destructor = kfree;
Is there any driver which uses different destructor for different
snapshots? Looks like something we could put in ops, maybe?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t nsim_dev_take_snapshot_write(struct file *file,
> const char __user *data,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev = file->private_data;
> - void *dummy_data;
> + devlink_snapshot_data_dest_t *destructor;
> + u8 *dummy_data;
> int err;
> u32 id;
>
> - dummy_data = kmalloc(NSIM_DEV_DUMMY_REGION_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dummy_data)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - get_random_bytes(dummy_data, NSIM_DEV_DUMMY_REGION_SIZE);
> + err = nsim_dev_take_snapshot(priv_to_devlink(nsim_dev), NULL,
> + &dummy_data, &destructor);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("Failed to capture region snapshot\n");
Also not a very useful message for netdevsim IMHO give the caller
clearly requested a snapshot and will get a more informative error
from errno.
> + return err;
> + }
>
> id = devlink_region_snapshot_id_get(priv_to_devlink(nsim_dev));
> err = devlink_region_snapshot_create(nsim_dev->dummy_region,
> - dummy_data, id, kfree);
> + dummy_data, id, destructor);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("Failed to create region snapshot\n");
> kfree(dummy_data);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists