[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:27:35 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of
rxrpc_local object
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:29:36 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> index 808a4723f868..abfff3e0921c 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void rxrpc_conn_retransmit_call(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
> break;
> }
>
> + BUG_ON(!conn->params.local);
> + BUG_ON(!conn->params.local->socket);
Is this really, really not possible to convert those into a WARN_ON()
and return?
> ret = kernel_sendmsg(conn->params.local->socket, &msg, iov, ioc, len);
> conn->params.peer->last_tx_at = ktime_get_seconds();
> if (ret < 0)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists