[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200204173019.4437-1-alex.aring@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:30:17 -0500
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrea.mayer@...roma2.it,
dav.lebrun@...il.com, mcr@...delman.ca, stefan@...enfreihafen.org,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] net: ipv6: seg6: headroom fixes
Hi netdev,
This patch series fixes issues which I discovered while implementing RPL
source routing for 6LoWPAN interfaces. 6LoWPAN interfaces are using a MTU
of 1280 which is the IPv6 minimum MTU. I suppose this is the right fix to
do that according to my explanation that tunnels which acting before L3
need to set this headroom. So far I see only segmentation route is affected
to it. Maybe BPF tunnels, but it depends on the case... Maybe a comment
need to be added there as well to not getting confused. If wanted I can
send another patch for a comment for net-next or even net? May the
variable should be renamed to l2_headroom?
I splitted this fix in two patches, I only tested the first one and I
think the second one. The second one should fix issues as well.
Open to discuss my patches and if isn't the real fix... how we fix it?
I cc'ed all necessary people and Andrea which seems to have some net-next
patches around who should consider this fix in their new patches.
- Alex
Alexander Aring (2):
net: ipv6: seg6_iptunnel: set tunnel headroom to zero
net: ipv6: seg6_local: don't set headroom
net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c | 2 --
net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 7 -------
2 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists