lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ75kXbS6AU6fLhVbKbvDBhN9-o3L94NsNcywROjU1bH0U4j+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:31:41 +0100
From:   William Dauchy <w.dauchy@...teo.com>
To:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc:     William Dauchy <w.dauchy@...teo.com>,
        NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net, ip6_tunnel: enhance tunnel locate with type check

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:01 PM Nicolas Dichtel
<nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> Can you elaborate? What problem does this solve?
> Which tree are you targeting? net or net-next?

I was seeing that as a nice to have for coherency between ip6_tunnel
and ip_tunnel. But we can drop this one if we lack of practical
example, as I was more concerned about link check in the 1/2 patch.
It was more for net in my opinion as I considered it not too invasive.
-- 
William

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ