[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ75kXbS6AU6fLhVbKbvDBhN9-o3L94NsNcywROjU1bH0U4j+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 18:31:41 +0100
From: William Dauchy <w.dauchy@...teo.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: William Dauchy <w.dauchy@...teo.com>,
NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net, ip6_tunnel: enhance tunnel locate with type check
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:01 PM Nicolas Dichtel
<nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> Can you elaborate? What problem does this solve?
> Which tree are you targeting? net or net-next?
I was seeing that as a nice to have for coherency between ip6_tunnel
and ip_tunnel. But we can drop this one if we lack of practical
example, as I was more concerned about link check in the 1/2 patch.
It was more for net in my opinion as I considered it not too invasive.
--
William
Powered by blists - more mailing lists