[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200205215446.GB3942@nautica>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:54:46 +0100
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Sergey Alirzaev <l29ah@...k.li>
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9pnet: allow making incomplete read requests
Sergey Alirzaev wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2020:
> A user doesn't necessarily want to wait for all the requested data to
> be available, since the waiting time for each request is unbounded.
>
> The new method permits sending one read request at a time and getting
> the response ASAP, allowing to use 9pnet with synthetic file systems
> representing arbitrary data streams.
Much better, thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Alirzaev <l29ah@...k.li>
> [...]
> + if (n != count) {
> + *err = -EFAULT;
> + p9_tag_remove(clnt, req);
> + return n;
> }
> - p9_tag_remove(clnt, req);
> + } else {
> + iov_iter_advance(to, count);
> + count;
Any reason for this stray 'count;' statement?
If you're ok with this I'll just take patch without that line, don't
bother resubmitting.
Will take a fair amount of time to make it to linux-next though, test
setup needs some love and I want to run tests even if this should be
straightforward...
Thanks,
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists