lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:39:24 +0100 (CET)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     boon.leong.ong@...el.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, tee.min.tan@...el.com,
        weifeng.voon@...el.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com, arnd@...db.de,
        alexandru.ardelean@...log.com,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/6] net: stmmac: Fix incorrect location to set
 real_num_rx|tx_queues

From: Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Date: Wed,  5 Feb 2020 16:55:05 +0800

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 5836b21edd7e..4d9afa13eeb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -2657,6 +2657,10 @@ static int stmmac_hw_setup(struct net_device *dev, bool init_ptp)
>  		stmmac_enable_tbs(priv, priv->ioaddr, enable, chan);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Configure real RX and TX queues */
> +	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use);
> +	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use);
> +
>  	/* Start the ball rolling... */
>  	stmmac_start_all_dma(priv);
>  

It is only safe to ignore the return values from
netif_set_real_num_{rx,tx}_queues() if you call them before the
network device is registered.  Because only in that case are these
functions guaranteed to succeed.

But now that you have moved these calls here, they can fail.

Therefore you must check the return value and unwind the state
completely upon failures.

Honestly, I think this change will have several undesirable side effects:

1) Lots of added new code complexity

2) A new failure mode when resuming the device, users will find this
   very hard to diagnose and recover from

What real value do you get from doing these calls after probe?

If you can't come up with a suitable answer to that question, you
should reconsider this change.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ