[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200205162934.220154-1-w.dauchy@criteo.com>
Date:   Wed,  5 Feb 2020 17:29:32 +0100
From:   William Dauchy <w.dauchy@...teo.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
        William Dauchy <w.dauchy@...teo.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] net, ip6_tunnel: enhance tunnel locate
While trying to create additional ip6tnl interfaces, I noted behavior
was different from ip_tunnel, especially when you need to create a new
tunnel in order to make use for x-netns communication between root
namespace and another one. It is an issue when you do not have specific
remote/local address.
changed in V2:
- splitted patch in two parts for link/type parameter
William Dauchy (2):
  net, ip6_tunnel: enhance tunnel locate with link check
  net, ip6_tunnel: enhance tunnel locate with type check
 net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
-- 
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
