[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200206111652.694507-2-jakub@cloudflare.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:16:50 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/3] bpf, sockmap: Don't sleep while holding RCU lock on tear-down
rcu_read_lock is needed to protect access to psock inside sock_map_unref
when tearing down the map. However, we can't afford to sleep in lock_sock
while in RCU read-side critical section. Grab the RCU lock only after we
have locked the socket.
This fixes RCU warnings triggerable on a VM with 1 vCPU when free'ing a
sockmap/sockhash that contains at least one socket:
| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 #450 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
| #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
| #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
| #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_map_free+0x5/0x170
| #3: ffff8881368c5df8 (&stab->lock){+...}, at: sock_map_free+0x64/0x170
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73 #450
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
| dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
| ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
| lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
| sock_map_free+0x95/0x170
| bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
| process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
| worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
| kthread+0x108/0x140
| ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
| ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
| ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
| =============================
| WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
| 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty #452 Not tainted
| -----------------------------
| include/linux/rcupdate.h:272 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section!
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|
|
| rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
| 4 locks held by kworker/0:1/62:
| #0: ffff88813b019748 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
| #1: ffffc900000abe50 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1d7/0x5e0
| #2: ffffffff82065d20 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: sock_hash_free+0x5/0x1d0
| #3: ffff888139966e00 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}, at: sock_hash_free+0x92/0x1d0
|
| stack backtrace:
| CPU: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.5.0-04005-g8fc91b972b73-dirty #452
| Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.fedoraproject.org-3.fc31 04/01/2014
| Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred
| Call Trace:
| dump_stack+0x71/0xa0
| ___might_sleep+0x105/0x190
| lock_sock_nested+0x28/0x90
| sock_hash_free+0xec/0x1d0
| bpf_map_free_deferred+0x58/0x80
| process_one_work+0x260/0x5e0
| worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
| kthread+0x108/0x140
| ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
| ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
| ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Fixes: 7e81a3530206 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
---
net/core/sock_map.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 8998e356f423..fd8b426dbdf3 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ static void sock_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
int i;
synchronize_rcu();
- rcu_read_lock();
raw_spin_lock_bh(&stab->lock);
for (i = 0; i < stab->map.max_entries; i++) {
struct sock **psk = &stab->sks[i];
@@ -243,12 +242,13 @@ static void sock_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
sk = xchg(psk, NULL);
if (sk) {
lock_sock(sk);
+ rcu_read_lock();
sock_map_unref(sk, psk);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
release_sock(sk);
}
}
raw_spin_unlock_bh(&stab->lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
synchronize_rcu();
@@ -859,19 +859,19 @@ static void sock_hash_free(struct bpf_map *map)
int i;
synchronize_rcu();
- rcu_read_lock();
for (i = 0; i < htab->buckets_num; i++) {
bucket = sock_hash_select_bucket(htab, i);
raw_spin_lock_bh(&bucket->lock);
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(elem, node, &bucket->head, node) {
hlist_del_rcu(&elem->node);
lock_sock(elem->sk);
+ rcu_read_lock();
sock_map_unref(elem->sk, elem);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
release_sock(elem->sk);
}
raw_spin_unlock_bh(&bucket->lock);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
bpf_map_area_free(htab->buckets);
kfree(htab);
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists