netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Fix perf_buffer creation on systems with offline CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200209210303.GA50543@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 9 Feb 2020 22:03:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Fix perf_buffer creation on systems with
 offline CPUs

On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 10:32:43AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 9:18 AM Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 07:05, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch set fixes perf_buffer__new() behavior on systems which have some of
> > > the CPUs offline/missing (due to difference between "possible" and "online"
> > > sets). perf_buffer will create per-CPU buffer and open/attach to corresponding
> > > perf_event only on CPUs present and online at the moment of perf_buffer
> > > creation. Without this logic, perf_buffer creation has no chances of
> > > succeeding on such systems, preventing valid and correct BPF applications from
> > > starting.
> > >
> > > Andrii Nakryiko (4):
> > >   libbpf: extract and generalize CPU mask parsing logic
> > >   selftests/bpf: add CPU mask parsing tests
> > >   libbpf: don't attach perf_buffer to offline/missing CPUs
> >
> > perf build failed on stable-rc 5.5 branch.
> >
> > libbpf.c: In function '__perf_buffer__new':
> > libbpf.c:6159:8: error: implicit declaration of function
> > 'parse_cpu_mask_file'; did you mean 'parse_uint_from_file'?
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >   err = parse_cpu_mask_file(online_cpus_file, &online, &n);
> >         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >         parse_uint_from_file
> > libbpf.c:6159:8: error: nested extern declaration of
> > 'parse_cpu_mask_file' [-Werror=nested-externs]
> >
> > build log,
> > https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.5/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=hikey,label=docker-lkft/11/console
> >
> 
> Thanks for reporting!
> 
> These changes depend on commit 6803ee25f0ea ("libbpf: Extract and
> generalize CPU mask parsing logic"), which weren't backported to
> stable. Greg, can you please pull that one as well? Thanks!

Now applied, thanks!

greg k-h