[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <918222d9-816a-be70-f8af-b8dfcb586240@cambridgegreys.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:42:37 +0000
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, mst@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso
On 11/02/2020 02:51, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/2/11 上午12:55, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/12/2019 10:48, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com wrote:
>>> From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
>>>
>>> Some of the frames marked as GSO which arrive at
>>> virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no
>>> fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter
>>> than the MTU (752 in my experiments).
>>>
>>> This is observed on raw sockets reading off vEth interfaces
>>> in all 4.x and 5.x kernels I tested.
>>>
>>> These frames are reported as invalid while they are in fact
>>> gso-less frames.
>>>
>>> This patch marks the vnet header as no-GSO for them instead
>>> of reporting it as invalid.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/virtio_net.h | 8 ++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
>>> index 0d1fe9297ac6..d90d5cff1b9a 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
>>> @@ -112,8 +112,12 @@ static inline int virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(const
>>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> hdr->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV4;
>>> else if (sinfo->gso_type & SKB_GSO_TCPV6)
>>> hdr->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV6;
>>> - else
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + else {
>>> + if (skb->data_len == 0)
>>> + hdr->gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE;
>>> + else
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> if (sinfo->gso_type & SKB_GSO_TCP_ECN)
>>> hdr->gso_type |= VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN;
>>> } else
>>>
>>
>> ping.
>>
>
> Do you mean gso_size is set but gso_type is not? Looks like a bug
> elsewhere.
>
> Thanks
>
>
Yes.
I could not trace it where it is coming from.
I see it when doing recvmmsg on raw sockets in the UML vector network
drivers.
--
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
https://www.cambridgegreys.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists