netdev - [PATCH][v2] page_pool: refill page when alloc.count of pool is zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1581387224-20719-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:13:44 +0800
From:   Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH][v2] page_pool: refill page when alloc.count of pool is zero

"do {} while" in page_pool_refill_alloc_cache will always
refill page once whether refill is true or false, and whether
alloc.count of pool is less than PP_ALLOC_CACHE_REFILL or not
this is wrong, and will cause overflow of pool->alloc.cache

the caller of __page_pool_get_cached should provide guarantee
that pool->alloc.cache is safe to access, so in_serving_softirq
should be removed as suggested by Jesper Dangaard Brouer in
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1233713/

so fix this issue by calling page_pool_refill_alloc_cache()
only when pool->alloc.count is zero

Fixes: 44768decb7c0 ("page_pool: handle page recycle for NUMA_NO_NODE condition")
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
Suggested: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
---
v1-->v2: remove the in_serving_softirq test

 net/core/page_pool.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 9b7cbe35df37..10d2b255df5e 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -99,8 +99,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_create);
 static void __page_pool_return_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page);
 
 noinline
-static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct page_pool *pool,
-						 bool refill)
+static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct page_pool *pool)
 {
 	struct ptr_ring *r = &pool->ring;
 	struct page *page;
@@ -141,8 +140,7 @@ static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct page_pool *pool,
 			page = NULL;
 			break;
 		}
-	} while (pool->alloc.count < PP_ALLOC_CACHE_REFILL &&
-		 refill);
+	} while (pool->alloc.count < PP_ALLOC_CACHE_REFILL);
 
 	/* Return last page */
 	if (likely(pool->alloc.count > 0))
@@ -155,20 +153,16 @@ static struct page *page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(struct page_pool *pool,
 /* fast path */
 static struct page *__page_pool_get_cached(struct page_pool *pool)
 {
-	bool refill = false;
 	struct page *page;
 
-	/* Test for safe-context, caller should provide this guarantee */
-	if (likely(in_serving_softirq())) {
-		if (likely(pool->alloc.count)) {
-			/* Fast-path */
-			page = pool->alloc.cache[--pool->alloc.count];
-			return page;
-		}
-		refill = true;
+	/* Caller MUST guarantee safe non-concurrent access, e.g. softirq */
+	if (likely(pool->alloc.count)) {
+		/* Fast-path */
+		page = pool->alloc.cache[--pool->alloc.count];
+	} else {
+		page = page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(pool);
 	}
 
-	page = page_pool_refill_alloc_cache(pool, refill);
 	return page;
 }
 
-- 
2.16.2