netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/14] bpf: Add trampoline and dispatcher to /proc/kallsyms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:32:23 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] bpf: Add trampoline and dispatcher to
 /proc/kallsyms

Em Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:17:51PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:51:08PM +0100, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 at 16:42, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > this patchset adds trampoline and dispatcher objects
> > > to be visible in /proc/kallsyms. The last patch also
> > > adds sorting for all bpf objects in /proc/kallsyms.

> > Thanks for working on this!

> > I'm probably missing something with my perf setup; I've applied your
> > patches, and everything seem to work fine from an kallsyms
> > perspective:

> > # grep bpf_dispatcher_xdp /proc/kallsyms
> > ...
> > ffffffffc0511000 t bpf_dispatcher_xdp   [bpf]
> > 
> > However, when I run
> > # perf top
> > 
> > I still see the undecorated one:
> > 0.90%  [unknown]                  [k] 0xffffffffc0511037
> > 
> > Any ideas?
 
> yea strange.. it should be picked up from /proc/kallsyms as
> fallback if there's no other source, I'll check on that
> (might be the problem with perf depending on address going
> only higher in /proc/kallsyms, while bpf symbols are at the
> end and start over from the lowest bpf address)
> 
> anyway, in perf we enumerate bpf_progs via the perf events
> PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_LOAD,PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD interface
> together with PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL_TYPE_BPF events
> 
> we might need to add something like:
>   PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL_TYPE_BPF_TRAMPOLINE
>   PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL_TYPE_BPF_DISPATCHER
> 
> to notify about the area, I'll check on that
> 
> however the /proc/kallsyms fallback should work in any
> case.. thanks for report ;-)

We should by now move kallsyms to be the preferred source of symbols,
not vmlinux, right?

Perhaps what is happening is:

[root@...co ~]# strace -f -e open,openat -o /tmp/bla perf top
[root@...co ~]# grep vmlinux /tmp/bla
11013 openat(AT_FDCWD, "vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
11013 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/boot/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
11013 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/boot/vmlinux-5.5.0+", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
11013 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/debug/boot/vmlinux-5.5.0+", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
11013 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/lib/modules/5.5.0+/build/vmlinux", O_RDONLY) = 152
[root@...co ~]#

I.e. it is using vmlinux for resolving symbols and he should try with:

[root@...co ~]# strace -f -e open,openat -o /tmp/bla perf top --ignore-vmlinux
[root@...co ~]# perf top -h vmlinux

 Usage: perf top [<options>]

    -k, --vmlinux <file>  vmlinux pathname
        --ignore-vmlinux  don't load vmlinux even if found

[root@...co ~]# grep vmlinux /tmp/bla
[root@...co ~]#

Historically vmlinux was preferred because it contains function sizes,
but with all these out of the blue symbols, we need to prefer starting
with /proc/kallsyms and, as we do now, continue getting updates via
PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL.

Humm, but then trampolines don't generate that, right? Or does it? If it
doesn't, then we will know about just the trampolines in place when the
record/top session starts, reparsing /proc/kallsyms periodically seems
excessive?

- Arnaldo