[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200212014107.110066-2-bpoirier@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:41:07 +0900
From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] ipv6: Fix nlmsg_flags when splitting a multipath route
When splitting an RTA_MULTIPATH request into multiple routes and adding the
second and later components, we must not simply remove NLM_F_REPLACE but
instead replace it by NLM_F_CREATE. Otherwise, it may look like the netlink
message was malformed.
For example,
ip route add 2001:db8::1/128 dev dummy0
ip route change 2001:db8::1/128 nexthop via fe80::30:1 dev dummy0 \
nexthop via fe80::30:2 dev dummy0
results in the following warnings:
[ 1035.057019] IPv6: RTM_NEWROUTE with no NLM_F_CREATE or NLM_F_REPLACE
[ 1035.057517] IPv6: NLM_F_CREATE should be set when creating new route
This patch makes the nlmsg sequence look equivalent for __ip6_ins_rt() to
what it would get if the multipath route had been added in multiple netlink
operations:
ip route add 2001:db8::1/128 dev dummy0
ip route change 2001:db8::1/128 nexthop via fe80::30:1 dev dummy0
ip route append 2001:db8::1/128 nexthop via fe80::30:2 dev dummy0
Fixes: 27596472473a ("ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...ulusnetworks.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 4fbdc60b4e07..2931224b674e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -5198,6 +5198,7 @@ static int ip6_route_multipath_add(struct fib6_config *cfg,
*/
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags &= ~(NLM_F_EXCL |
NLM_F_REPLACE);
+ cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags |= NLM_F_CREATE;
nhn++;
}
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists