[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874kvwhs6u.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:05:13 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com,
yhs@...com, andriin@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Add support for dynamic program attach target
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com> writes:
> Currently when you want to attach a trace program to a bpf program
> the section name needs to match the tracepoint/function semantics.
>
> However the addition of the bpf_program__set_attach_target() API
> allows you to specify the tracepoint/function dynamically.
>
> The call flow would look something like this:
>
> xdp_fd = bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id(id);
> trace_obj = bpf_object__open_file("func.o", NULL);
> prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(trace_obj,
> "fentry/myfunc");
> bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, xdp_fd,
> "fentry/xdpfilt_blk_all");
I think it would be better to have the attach type as a separate arg
instead of encoding it in the function name. I.e., rather:
bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, xdp_fd,
"xdpfilt_blk_all", BPF_TRACE_FENTRY);
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists