[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <741c1c4e-9f83-d5bd-0100-d33cb5db7cc6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:11:26 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: rtnetlink: fix bugs in rtnl_alt_ifname()
On 2/12/20 10:58 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 2/12/20 10:45 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:58:26AM CET, edumazet@...gle.com wrote:
>>> Since IFLA_ALT_IFNAME is an NLA_STRING, we have no
>>> guarantee it is nul terminated.
>>>
>>> We should use nla_strdup() instead of kstrdup(), since this
>>> helper will make sure not accessing out-of-bounds data.
>>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 36fbf1e52bd3 ("net: rtnetlink: add linkprop commands to add and delete alternative ifnames")
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>> index 09c44bf2e1d28842d77b4ed442ef2c051a25ad21..e1152f4ffe33efb0a69f17a1f5940baa04942e5b 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>>> @@ -3504,27 +3504,25 @@ static int rtnl_alt_ifname(int cmd, struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr,
>>> if (err)
>>> return err;
>>>
>>> - alt_ifname = nla_data(attr);
>>> + alt_ifname = nla_strdup(attr, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!alt_ifname)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> if (cmd == RTM_NEWLINKPROP) {
>>> - alt_ifname = kstrdup(alt_ifname, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (!alt_ifname)
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> err = netdev_name_node_alt_create(dev, alt_ifname);
>>> - if (err) {
>>> - kfree(alt_ifname);
>>> - return err;
>>> - }
>>> + if (!err)
>>> + alt_ifname = NULL;
>>> } else if (cmd == RTM_DELLINKPROP) {
>>> err = netdev_name_node_alt_destroy(dev, alt_ifname);
>>> - if (err)
>>> - return err;
>>> } else {
>>
>>
>>> - WARN_ON(1);
>>> - return 0;
>>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>>> + err = -EINVAL;
>>
>> These 4 lines do not seem to be related to the rest of the patch. Should
>> it be a separate patch?
>
> Well, we have to kfree(alt_ifname).
>
> Generally speaking I tried to avoid return in the middle of this function.
>
> The WARN_ON(1) is dead code today, making it a WARN_ON_ONCE(1) is simply
> a matter of avoiding syslog floods if this path is ever triggered in the future.
Also, related to this new fancy code ;)
Is there anything preventing netdev_name_node_alt_destroy() from destroying the primary
ifname ?
netdev_name_node_lookup() should be able to find dev->name_node itself ?
Then we would leave a dangling pointer in dev->name_node, and crash later.
I am thinking we need this fix :
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a6316b336128cdb31eea6e80f1a47620abbd0d31..3fa2bc2c30ee1350b5b4b400f0552b9bf2a62697 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -331,6 +331,11 @@ int netdev_name_node_alt_destroy(struct net_device *dev, const char *name)
name_node = netdev_name_node_lookup(net, name);
if (!name_node)
return -ENOENT;
+
+ /* Do not trust users, ever ! */
+ if (name_node == dev->name_node || name_node->dev != dev)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
__netdev_name_node_alt_destroy(name_node);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists