[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200214164553.GV31668@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:45:53 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Andrew Boyer <aboyer@...sando.io>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 18/25] RDMA/irdma: Implement device supported verb
APIs
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:49:38AM -0500, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Feb 14, 2020, at 9:54 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:14:17AM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > ...
> > New drivers are forbidden from calling this:
> >
> > /**
> > * rdma_set_device_sysfs_group - Set device attributes group to have
> > * driver specific sysfs entries at
> > * for infiniband class.
> > *
> > * @device: device pointer for which attributes to be created
> > * @group: Pointer to group which should be added when device
> > * is registered with sysfs.
> > * rdma_set_device_sysfs_group() allows existing drivers to expose one
> > * group per device to have sysfs attributes.
> > *
> > * NOTE: New drivers should not make use of this API; instead new device
> > * parameter should be exposed via netlink command. This API and mechanism
> > * exist only for existing drivers.
> > */
> >
> > Jason
>
> Is there an existing field in RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_* that allows us to
> display a string to use as a replacement for the board_id in sysfs?
I don't think so, this is highly vendor specific stuff.
> Like “Mellanox ConnectX-3” or similar.
General names like that can come from the pci database that udev and
lspci keeps. Ie if you do 'systemctl -a' on a modern system with
rdma-core you will see the PCI device description show up next to the
verbs char device.
> The other two sysfs fields (hca_type and hw_rev) seem to have been unused.
I wonder if hw_rev was supposed to be the same as hw_ver (see
ib_uverbs_query_device_resp).
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists