[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200214081324.48dc2090@hermes.lan>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:13:24 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 iproute2-next 3/7] iproute_lwtunnel: add options
support for erspan metadata
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:30:47 +0800
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> +
> + open_json_array(PRINT_JSON, name);
> + open_json_object(NULL);
> + print_uint(PRINT_JSON, "ver", NULL, ver);
> + print_uint(PRINT_JSON, "index", NULL, idx);
> + print_uint(PRINT_JSON, "dir", NULL, dir);
> + print_uint(PRINT_JSON, "hwid", NULL, hwid);
> + close_json_object();
> + close_json_array(PRINT_JSON, name);
> +
> + print_nl();
> + print_string(PRINT_FP, name, "\t%s ", name);
> + sprintf(strbuf, "%02x:%08x:%02x:%02x", ver, idx, dir, hwid);
> + print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "%s ", strbuf);
> +}
Instead of having two sets of prints, is it possible to do this
print_nl();
print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "\t", NULL);
open_json_array(PRINT_ANY, name);
open_json_object(NULL);
print_0xhex(PRINT_ANY, "ver", " %02x", ver);
print_0xhex(PRINT_ANY, "idx", ":%08x", idx);
print_0xhex(PRINT_ANY, "dir", ":%02x", dir);
print_0xhex(PRINT_ANY, "hwid", ":%02x", hwid)
close_json_object();
close_json_array(PRINT_ANY, " ");
Also, you seem to not hear the request to not use opaque hex values
in the iproute2 interface. The version, index, etc should be distinct
parameter values not a hex string.
I think this still needs more work before merging.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists