lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9oMyauDtVaOSfmeVAKmCr_QBoqC1Vmh+aprtO=Z57PGxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:11:34 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] wireguard: device: provide sane limits for mtu setting

Hi Eric,

On 2/14/20, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> If wireguard device mtu is set to zero, a divide by zero
> crash happens in calculate_skb_padding().
>
> This patch provides dev->min_mtu and dev->max_mtu bounds.

Thanks for the patch. However, I solved this slightly differently
yesterday afternoon already:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/commit/?h=stable&id=06e79ab0d545a20dec1b179fa26841eb0afb1f07
. I've got some additional testing of this to do this afternoon, and
then I'll submit it to the list.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ