[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200215.015647.1085864163503366086.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:56:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: marex@...x.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lukas@...ner.de, ynezz@...e.cz,
yuehaibing@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: ks8851-ml: Fix 16-bit data access
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:47:56 +0100
> On 2/15/20 10:24 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:41:38 +0100
>>
>>> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static inline void ks_inblk(struct ks_net *ks, u16 *wptr, u32 len)
>>> {
>>> len >>= 1;
>>> while (len--)
>>> - *wptr++ = (u16)ioread16(ks->hw_addr);
>>> + *wptr++ = swab16(ioread16(ks->hw_addr));
>>
>> I agree with the other feedback, the endianness looks wrong here.
>>
>> The ioread16() translates whatever is behind ks->hw_addr into cpu
>> endianness.
>>
>> This is either always little endian (for example), which means that
>> unconditionally swapping this doesn't seem to make sense.
>
> So what is the suggestion to fix this properly ?
once you know the endianness coming out of ioread16() you can then
use le16_to_cpu() or be16_to_cpu() as appropriate.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists