[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46537e63-1ba9-5e76-fad3-03cae4d0d60f@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:00:08 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...ulusnetworks.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv6: Fix route replacement with dev-only route
On 2/11/20 6:41 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> After commit 27596472473a ("ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement") it is no
> longer possible to replace an ECMP-able route by a non ECMP-able route.
> For example,
> ip route add 2001:db8::1/128 via fe80::1 dev dummy0
> ip route replace 2001:db8::1/128 dev dummy0
> does not work as expected.
>
> Tweak the replacement logic so that point 3 in the log of the above commit
> becomes:
> 3. If the new route is not ECMP-able, and no matching non-ECMP-able route
> exists, replace matching ECMP-able route (if any) or add the new route.
>
> We can now summarize the entire replace semantics to:
> When doing a replace, prefer replacing a matching route of the same
> "ECMP-able-ness" as the replace argument. If there is no such candidate,
> fallback to the first route found.
>
> Fixes: 27596472473a ("ipv6: fix ECMP route replacement")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...ulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 7 ++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
> index 58fbde244381..72abf892302f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
> @@ -1102,8 +1102,7 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct fib6_info *rt,
> found++;
> break;
> }
> - if (rt_can_ecmp)
> - fallback_ins = fallback_ins ?: ins;
> + fallback_ins = fallback_ins ?: ins;
> goto next_iter;
> }
>
> @@ -1146,7 +1145,9 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct fib6_info *rt,
> }
>
> if (fallback_ins && !found) {
> - /* No ECMP-able route found, replace first non-ECMP one */
> + /* No matching route with same ecmp-able-ness found, replace
> + * first matching route
> + */
> ins = fallback_ins;
> iter = rcu_dereference_protected(*ins,
> lockdep_is_held(&rt->fib6_table->tb6_lock));
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> index 6dd403103800..60273f1bc7d9 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_tests.sh
> @@ -910,6 +910,12 @@ ipv6_rt_replace_mpath()
> check_route6 "2001:db8:104::/64 via 2001:db8:101::3 dev veth1 metric 1024"
> log_test $? 0 "Multipath with single path via multipath attribute"
>
> + # multipath with dev-only
> + add_initial_route6 "nexthop via 2001:db8:101::2 nexthop via 2001:db8:103::2"
> + run_cmd "$IP -6 ro replace 2001:db8:104::/64 dev veth1"
> + check_route6 "2001:db8:104::/64 dev veth1 metric 1024"
> + log_test $? 0 "Multipath with dev-only"
> +
> # route replace fails - invalid nexthop 1
> add_initial_route6 "nexthop via 2001:db8:101::2 nexthop via 2001:db8:103::2"
> run_cmd "$IP -6 ro replace 2001:db8:104::/64 nexthop via 2001:db8:111::3 nexthop via 2001:db8:103::3"
>
Thanks for adding a test case. I take this to mean that all existing
tests pass with this change. We have found this code to be extremely
sensitive to seemingly obvious changes.
Added Ido.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists