[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d267d4f2-58b1-e55f-bbbf-cf82535aee0b@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 23:10:53 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] sh_eth: check sh_eth_cpu_data::no_xdfar when
dumping registers
When adding the sh_eth_cpu_data::no_xdfar flag I forgot to add the flag
check to __sh_eth_get_regs(), causing the non-existing RDFAR/TDFAR to be
considered for dumping on the R-Car gen1/2 SoCs (the register offset check
has the final say here)...
Fixes: 4c1d45850d5 ("sh_eth: add sh_eth_cpu_data::cexcr flag")
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Tested-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>
---
Changes in version 2:
- added Chris' tag.
drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
===================================================================
--- net-next.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
+++ net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
@@ -2140,11 +2140,13 @@ static size_t __sh_eth_get_regs(struct n
add_reg(EESR);
add_reg(EESIPR);
add_reg(TDLAR);
- add_reg(TDFAR);
+ if (!cd->no_xdfar)
+ add_reg(TDFAR);
add_reg(TDFXR);
add_reg(TDFFR);
add_reg(RDLAR);
- add_reg(RDFAR);
+ if (!cd->no_xdfar)
+ add_reg(RDFAR);
add_reg(RDFXR);
add_reg(RDFFR);
add_reg(TRSCER);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists