[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200216094307.55a66c52@hermes.lan>
Date:   Sun, 16 Feb 2020 09:43:07 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 206523] New: Can no longer add routes while the link is
 down, RTNETLINK answers: Network is down
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:04:40 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: [Bug 206523] New: Can no longer add routes while the link is down, RTNETLINK answers: Network is down
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206523
            Bug ID: 206523
           Summary: Can no longer add routes while the link is down,
                    RTNETLINK answers: Network is down
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 5.4.19
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
          Assignee: stephen@...workplumber.org
          Reporter: rm+bko@...anrm.net
        Regression: No
Hello,
I'm upgrading my machines from kernel 4.14 to the 5.4 series, and noticed quite
a significant behavior change, so I was wondering if this was intentional or a
side effect of something, or a bug. It already broke my network connectivity
for a while and required troubleshooting, to figure out that a certain script
that I had, used to set up all routes before, and only then putting the
interface up.
On 4.14.170 this works:
# ip link add dummy100 type dummy
# ip route add fd99::/128 dev dummy100
# ip -6 route | grep dummy
fd99:: dev dummy100 metric 1024 linkdown  pref medium
#
On 5.4.19 however:
# ip link add dummy100 type dummy
# ip route add fd99::/128 dev dummy100
RTNETLINK answers: Network is down
# ip -6 route | grep dummy
#
Sorry for not narrowing it down more precisely between 4.14 and 5.4, but I'm
sure for the right people this will be easily either an "oh shit" or "yeah,
that", even without any more precise version information :)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
