[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200217152455.15341-3-ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:24:51 +0100
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com,
kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/smc: use termination worker under send_lock
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
smc_tx_rdma_write() is called under the send_lock and should not call
smc_lgr_terminate() directly. Call smc_lgr_terminate_sched() instead
which schedules a worker.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/smc_tx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 0d42e7716b91..9f1ade86d70e 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int smc_tx_rdma_write(struct smc_connection *conn, int peer_rmbe_offset,
rdma_wr->rkey = lgr->rtokens[conn->rtoken_idx][SMC_SINGLE_LINK].rkey;
rc = ib_post_send(link->roce_qp, &rdma_wr->wr, NULL);
if (rc)
- smc_lgr_terminate(lgr, true);
+ smc_lgr_terminate_sched(lgr);
return rc;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists