[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200216.192928.1291469951934245769.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:29:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mkubecek@...e.cz
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ethtool: fix application of verbose no_mask bitset
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 01:55:53 +0100 (CET)
> A bitset without mask in a _SET request means we want exactly the bits in
> the bitset to be set. This works correctly for compact format but when
> verbose format is parsed, ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose() only sets the
> bits present in the request bitset but does not clear the rest. This can
> cause incorrect results like
>
> lion:~ # ethtool eth0 | grep Wake
> Supports Wake-on: pumbg
> Wake-on: g
> lion:~ # ethtool -s eth0 wol u
> lion:~ # ethtool eth0 | grep Wake
> Supports Wake-on: pumbg
> Wake-on: ug
>
> when the second ethtool command issues request
>
> ETHTOOL_MSG_WOL_SET
> ETHTOOL_A_WOL_HEADER
> ETHTOOL_A_HEADER_DEV_NAME = "eth0"
> ETHTOOL_A_WOL_MODES
> ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_NOMASK
> ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS
> ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS_BIT
> ETHTOOL_BITSET_BIT_INDEX = 1
>
> Fix the logic by clearing the whole target bitmap before we start iterating
> through the request bits.
>
> Fixes: 10b518d4e6dd ("ethtool: netlink bitset handling")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Applied, thanks Michal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists