[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200218222101.635808-4-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:20:55 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] netfilter: flowtable: skip offload setup if disabled
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
nftables test case
tests/shell/testcases/flowtable/0001flowtable_0
results in a crash. After the refactor, if we leave early via
nf_flowtable_hw_offload(), then "struct flow_block_offload" is left
in an uninitialized state, but later users assume its initialised.
Fixes: a7965d58ddab02 ("netfilter: flowtable: add nf_flow_table_offload_cmd()")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
index 83e1db37c3b0..06f00cdc3891 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
@@ -847,9 +847,6 @@ static int nf_flow_table_offload_cmd(struct flow_block_offload *bo,
{
int err;
- if (!nf_flowtable_hw_offload(flowtable))
- return 0;
-
if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -876,6 +873,9 @@ int nf_flow_table_offload_setup(struct nf_flowtable *flowtable,
struct flow_block_offload bo;
int err;
+ if (!nf_flowtable_hw_offload(flowtable))
+ return 0;
+
err = nf_flow_table_offload_cmd(&bo, flowtable, dev, cmd, &extack);
if (err < 0)
return err;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists