[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219115415.57ee6d3c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:54:15 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 04/19] bpf/tracing: Remove redundant
preempt_disable() in __bpf_trace_run()
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:39:21 +0100
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> __bpf_trace_run() disables preemption around the BPF_PROG_RUN() invocation.
>
> This is redundant because __bpf_trace_run() is invoked from a trace point
> via __DO_TRACE() which already disables preemption _before_ invoking any of
> the functions which are attached to a trace point.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -1476,9 +1476,7 @@ static __always_inline
> void __bpf_trace_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 *args)
> {
Should there be a "cant_migrate()" added here?
-- Steve
> rcu_read_lock();
> - preempt_disable();
> (void) BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, args);
> - preempt_enable();
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists