[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f31787df-17b9-0169-8c2d-7e4a5111af0c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:43:18 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: broadcom: Have
bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk() check for flags
On 2/15/20 8:08 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:38:52PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk() already checks for the flags and will
>> correctly reacting to the 3 different flags it check, allow it to be
>> unconditionally called.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> index 4ad2128cc454..b4eae84a9195 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
>> @@ -273,10 +273,7 @@ static int bcm54xx_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> (phydev->dev_flags & PHY_BRCM_CLEAR_RGMII_MODE))
>> bcm_phy_write_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_RGMII_MODE, 0);
>>
>> - if ((phydev->dev_flags & PHY_BRCM_RX_REFCLK_UNUSED) ||
>> - (phydev->dev_flags & PHY_BRCM_DIS_TXCRXC_NOENRGY) ||
>> - (phydev->dev_flags & PHY_BRCM_AUTO_PWRDWN_ENABLE))
>> - bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk(phydev);
>> + bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk(phydev);
>
> Hi Florian
>
> PHY_BRCM_RX_REFCLK_UNUSED is not unconditionally checked in
> bcm54xx_adjust_rxrefclk(), where as here it is. I assume this is O.K?
> The same is tree for PHY_BRCM_AUTO_PWRDWN_ENABLE. Maybe worth a
> comment in the commit message if you need to respin.
Indeed, let me correct that in the commit message.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists