netdev - [PATCH net v4] net/tls: Fix to avoid gettig invalid tls record

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200219041022.22701-1-rohitm@chelsio.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:40:22 +0530
From:   Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     borisp@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        manojmalviya@...lsio.com, Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v4] net/tls: Fix to avoid gettig invalid tls record

Current code doesn't check if tcp sequence number is starting from (/after)
1st record's start sequnce number. It only checks if seq number is before
1st record's end sequnce number. This problem will always be a possibility
in re-transmit case. If a record which belongs to a requested seq number is
already deleted, tls_get_record will start looking into list and as per the
check it will look if seq number is before the end seq of 1st record, which
will always be true and will return 1st record always, it should in fact
return NULL.
As part of the fix, start looking each record only if the sequence number
lies in the list else return NULL.
There is one more check added, driver look for the start marker record to
handle tcp packets which are before the tls offload start sequence number,
hence return 1st record if the record is tls start marker and seq number is
before the 1st record's starting sequence number.

Fixes: e8f69799810c ("net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>
---
 net/tls/tls_device.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
index cd91ad812291..e72d7d787935 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ struct tls_record_info *tls_get_record(struct tls_offload_context_tx *context,
 				       u32 seq, u64 *p_record_sn)
 {
 	u64 record_sn = context->hint_record_sn;
-	struct tls_record_info *info;
+	struct tls_record_info *info, *last;

 	info = context->retransmit_hint;
 	if (!info ||
@@ -604,6 +604,24 @@ struct tls_record_info *tls_get_record(struct tls_offload_context_tx *context,
 						struct tls_record_info, list);
 		if (!info)
 			return NULL;
+		/* send the start_marker record if seq number is before the
+		 * tls offload start marker sequence number. This record is
+		 * required to handle TCP packets which are before TLS offload
+		 * started.
+		 *  And if it's not start marker, look if this seq number
+		 * belongs to the list.
+		 */
+		if (likely(!tls_record_is_start_marker(info))) {
+			/* we have the first record, get the last record to see
+			 * if this seq number belongs to the list.
+			 */
+			last = list_last_entry(&context->records_list,
+					       struct tls_record_info, list);
+
+			if (!between(seq, tls_record_start_seq(info),
+				     last->end_seq))
+				return NULL;
+		}
 		record_sn = context->unacked_record_sn;
 	}

-- 
2.25.0.191.gde93cc1