[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200220113528.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:35:28 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] VLANs, DSA switches and multiple bridges
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:07:07PM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Some switches like the Marvell 88E6060 don't have a VTU, so programming the
> default PVID would return -EOPNOTSUPP.
The 88e6060 has its own driver separate from mv88e6xxx.
> Switches supporting only global VLAN
> filtering cannot have a VLAN filtering aware bridge as well as a non VLAN
> filtering aware bridge spanning their ports at the same time. But all this
> shouldn't be a problem because drivers inform the stack whether they support
> ds->vlan_filtering per-port, globally or not. We should simply reject the
> operation when vlan_filtering is being enabled on unsupported hardware.
>
> Linux bridge is the reference for the implementation of an Ethernet bridge,
> if it programs VLAN entries, supported DSA hardware must do so. I'm not a
> fan of having our own bridge logic in DSA, so the limitation implemented by
> 2ea7a679ca2a ("net: dsa: Don't add vlans when vlan filtering is disabled")
> needs to go in my opinion.
... which is basically what patch 3 is doing, but in a per-driver
manner.
The checks introduced in 2ea7a679ca2a ("net: dsa: Don't add vlans when
vlan filtering is disabled") were raised up a level by c5335d737ff3
("net: dsa: check bridge VLAN in slave operations") to their present
positions, which are then touched by my patch 3 to make the checks
conditional.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists