[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJdONoTQmu8WugEXLsiZOzbb9Kiw-Q9ZVC+pDiSUufTOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:05:07 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: relax check whether BTF is mandatory
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:27 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
>
> If BPF program is using BTF-defined maps, BTF is required only for
> libbpf itself to process map definitions. If after that BTF fails to
> be loaded into kernel (e.g., if it doesn't support BTF at all), this
> shouldn't prevent valid BPF program from loading. Existing
> retry-without-BTF logic for creating maps will succeed to create such
> maps without any problems. So, presence of .maps section shouldn't make
> BTF required for kernel. Update the check accordingly.
>
> Validated by ensuring simple BPF program with BTF-defined maps is still
> loaded on old kernel without BTF support and map is correctly parsed and
> created.
>
> Fixes: abd29c931459 ("libbpf: allow specifying map definitions using BTF")
> Reported-by: Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Applied. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists