netdev - [net-next 02/12] net: intel: e1000e: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in e1000e_get_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200220005713.682605-3-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:57:03 -0800
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 02/12] net: intel: e1000e: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in e1000e_get_hw_semaphore()

From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>

The driver may sleep while holding a spinlock.
The function call path (from bottom to top) in Linux 4.19 is:

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c, 1366:
	usleep_range in e1000e_get_hw_semaphore
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/80003es2lan.c, 322:
	e1000e_get_hw_semaphore in e1000_release_swfw_sync_80003es2lan
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/80003es2lan.c, 197:
	e1000_release_swfw_sync_80003es2lan in e1000_release_phy_80003es2lan
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 4883:
	(FUNC_PTR) e1000_release_phy_80003es2lan in e1000e_update_phy_stats
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 4917:
	e1000e_update_phy_stats in e1000e_update_stats
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 5945:
	e1000e_update_stats in e1000e_get_stats64
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 5944:
	spin_lock in e1000e_get_stats64

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c, 1384:
	usleep_range in e1000e_get_hw_semaphore
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/80003es2lan.c, 322:
	e1000e_get_hw_semaphore in e1000_release_swfw_sync_80003es2lan
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/80003es2lan.c, 197:
	e1000_release_swfw_sync_80003es2lan in e1000_release_phy_80003es2lan
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 4883:
	(FUNC_PTR) e1000_release_phy_80003es2lan in e1000e_update_phy_stats
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 4917:
	e1000e_update_phy_stats in e1000e_update_stats
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 5945:
	e1000e_update_stats in e1000e_get_stats64
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c, 5944:
	spin_lock in e1000e_get_stats64

(FUNC_PTR) means a function pointer is called.

To fix these bugs, usleep_range() is replaced with udelay().

These bugs are found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by myself.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
index e531976f8a67..51512a73fdd0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/mac.c
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ s32 e1000e_get_hw_semaphore(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 		if (!(swsm & E1000_SWSM_SMBI))
 			break;
 
-		usleep_range(50, 100);
+		udelay(100);
 		i++;
 	}
 
@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ s32 e1000e_get_hw_semaphore(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 		if (er32(SWSM) & E1000_SWSM_SWESMBI)
 			break;
 
-		usleep_range(50, 100);
+		udelay(100);
 	}
 
 	if (i == timeout) {
-- 
2.24.1