[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89dda0680320d0ce1b42093e59985313e2a1ac50.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:37:50 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "natechancellor@...il.com" <natechancellor@...il.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: Fix header guard in rsc_dump.h
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 22:24 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Clang warns:
>
> In file included from
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c:73:
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/rsc_dump.h:4:9:
> warning:
> '__MLX5_RSC_DUMP_H' is used as a header guard here, followed by
> #define
> of a different macro [-Wheader-guard]
> #ifndef __MLX5_RSC_DUMP_H
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/rsc_dump.h:5:9:
> note:
> '__MLX5_RSC_DUMP__H' is defined here; did you mean
> '__MLX5_RSC_DUMP_H'?
> #define __MLX5_RSC_DUMP__H
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> __MLX5_RSC_DUMP_H
> 1 warning generated.
>
> Make them match to get the intended behavior and remove the warning.
Applied to net-next-mlx5
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists