[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db8982236a8694262b0848ad8fdd46f5d8c0cf52.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:06:54 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
"saeedm@....mellanox.co.il" <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>,
"xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com" <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>,
"gerlitz.or@...il.com" <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net/mlx5e: Don't allow forwarding between
uplink
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 22:08 +0800, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> We can install forwarding packets rule between uplink
> in switchdev mode, as show below. But the hardware does
> not do that as expected (mlnx_perf -i $PF1, we can't get
> the counter of the PF1). By the way, if we add the uplink
> PF0, PF1 to Open vSwitch and enable hw-offload, the rules
> can be offloaded but not work fine too. This patch add a
> check and if so return -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> $ tc filter add dev $PF0 protocol all parent ffff: prio 1 handle 1 \
> flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev $PF1
>
> $ tc -d -s filter show dev $PF0 ingress
> skip_sw
> in_hw in_hw_count 1
> action order 1: mirred (Egress Redirect to device enp130s0f1)
> stolen
> ...
> Sent hardware 408954 bytes 4173 pkt
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Applied to net-next-mlx5
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists