netdev - Re: [CFT 6/8] net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200221202500.GL25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 20:25:00 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [CFT 6/8] net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link_up()

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Thanks, that looks reasonable to me. I'll replace my patch with this
> > one if it's appropriate for net-next when I send this series for
> > merging.  However, I see most affected network driver maintainers
> > haven't responded yet, which is rather disappointing.  So, thanks
> > for taking the time to look at this.
> 
> Hi Russell
> 
> I suspect most maintainers are lazy. Give them a branch to pull, and
> they might be more likely to test.

git://git.armlinux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-net-next.git

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up